Water resources: reliable supply and competing uses

Separate rainfall from accessible water, compare transfer and treatment, and evaluate conservation.

Explain water insecurity

Water security depends on amount, timing, quality, access and reliability. Rainfall can be plentiful while usable supply is limited by pollution, storage or infrastructure.

Demand includes households, farming and industry. Withdrawals differ from consumption because some water returns to the system, often with changed quality or timing.

Worked example

A fictional reservoir stores 40 million m³ and supplies 2 million m³ weekly. Dividing gives 20 weeks only if there are no inflows, evaporation, reserve requirements or demand changes.

Common mistake: Storage divided by demand is a simplified duration, not a secure forecast.

Climate graphs · Mean, median and range

Compare supply strategies

Storage, transfers, treatment, reuse and desalination affect different sources and locations. Energy, waste streams and upstream/downstream impacts need evaluation.

Singapore’s supply approach provides bounded evidence for reuse and diversification. It does not satisfy every board’s requirement for a local LIC/NEE scheme.

Worked example

A fictional transfer takes 10 units from an upstream flow of 50. The remaining 40 represents a 20% reduction at that point before return flows and other changes.

Common mistake: Water supplied to one place can change availability elsewhere.

Percentage change · Source evaluation

Judge demand management

Metering, leakage reduction, efficient devices and restrictions can reduce different forms of demand. Effects depend on user behaviour, cost and implementation.

Cape Town’s drought evidence prompts questions about collective response and unequal capacity to cope. Reduced demand needs to be measured over a defined period.

Worked example

Fictional daily demand falls from 200 to 150 units: 25%. If the population also changes, compare per-person values as well as totals.

Common mistake: A lower total need not mean every household reduced consumption equally.

Percentage change · Source evaluation

Try a different resource

GIS site selection

This training rule requires at least 2 hectares, outside protected land and the indicated flood zone. Among eligible sites, choose the lowest stated walk time. It is an explicit exercise rule, not a real planning approval.

Scroll the diagram sideways to see the full resource.

Fictional site-selection overlaysNorth is up. Blue band: excluded flood zone. Green block: protected land. Sites: A: protected no, flood zone no, area 3 hectares, walk 11 minutes; B: protected no, flood zone yes, area 2 hectares, walk 19 minutes; C: protected yes, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 15 minutes; D: protected no, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 7 minutes. Minimum area 2 hectares.ABCDFlood zoneProtectedlandRule: outside both zones; area at least 2 hectares.Among eligible sites, choose the shortest stated walk.
SiteProtected landFlood zoneArea (hectares)Walk to bus stop (min)
ANoNo311
BNoYes219
CYesNo515
DNoNo57
Fictional site-selection overlays. Original fictional resource; not an official map or real dataset.
Resource description

North is up. Blue band: excluded flood zone. Green block: protected land. Sites: A: protected no, flood zone no, area 3 hectares, walk 11 minutes; B: protected no, flood zone yes, area 2 hectares, walk 19 minutes; C: protected yes, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 15 minutes; D: protected no, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 7 minutes. Minimum area 2 hectares.

1. How many sites meet every eligibility condition?

2. Which site does the stated rule select?

Choose an answer

3. What does the exercise establish?

Choose an answer

The maps and data are fictional. These exercises do not count as required fieldwork.

Write an explanation

Check your answer
  • Explain a mechanism for each approach.
  • Trace users and locations affected.
  • Evaluate reliability, energy and ecological effects.
  • Keep case scope and option requirements visible.

Practise and review a written answer

Case studies

Singapore’s diversified water supply · Cape Town’s water-security crisis · The shrinking Aral Sea

These pages provide selected evidence. Check the whole case requirement with your teacher.

Read further

Water security and competing uses · Adaptation to changing conditions

Course links

AQA GCSE Geography · Higher Geography · Pearson Edexcel GCSE Geography A · Eduqas GCSE Geography A · Eduqas GCSE Geography B

Next topics

Food security: supply, access and sustainable choices · Water cycles: budgets, residence time and feedback

Selected teaching sequence with fictional worked data. The linked case records supply bounded evidence; they do not satisfy every course case requirement.

Scottish links identify reusable parts of the topic. Scottish landforms, soil, weather and disease requirements need additional course-specific teaching.

Worked numerical examples are fictional unless explicitly attributed. These lessons cover selected parts of the topic; check your course requirements for the rest.