Resource security: stocks, conflicts and alternative futures

Analyse resource availability and power, compare water and energy security, and evaluate scenarios with distributional effects.

A-level study: check your qualification and chosen options below.

Distinguish physical resources and usable supply

Resource availability depends on physical occurrence, technology, costs and institutions. A geological resource is not the same as an economically recoverable reserve under stated conditions.

Water quality and seasonality, energy conversion and infrastructure, and mineral processing affect usable supply. Security also concerns access and reliability.

Worked example

A fictional deposit contains 100 units, of which 30 are currently recoverable under stated assumptions. Price or technology changes may alter the reserve estimate without changing the original deposit.

Common mistake: A reserve-to-production ratio is not a guaranteed exhaustion date.

Percentage change · Source evaluation

Trace a conflict across places

Water transfers and dams connect upstream and downstream users. Energy and mineral chains link extraction, processing and consumption across borders.

Power, rights and institutions influence who decides and who bears costs. Evaluate competing welfare, ecological and economic outcomes, not just total production.

Worked example

A fictional dam supplies 40 units of irrigation water but reduces seasonal downstream delivery by 25 units. A comparison needs timing, return flows and environmental requirements.

Common mistake: More supplied water in one area does not establish a net regional benefit.

Source evaluation · Climate graphs

Evaluate alternative futures

Demand reduction, diversification, recycling and technological change affect different constraints. Scenarios make assumptions about population, consumption, climate, costs and institutions explicit.

An adaptive strategy can preserve choices while meeting present needs. Some options involve irreversible land or ecological changes, so compare their timing and distribution.

Worked example

Fictional demand rises 20% while efficiency reduces demand per service by 25%. Combined index is 1.2 × 0.75 = 0.9: demand falls 10% if service definitions and other assumptions hold.

Common mistake: Efficiency gains can be offset by increased consumption or changed behaviour.

Index numbers · Source evaluation

Try a different resource

GIS site selection

This training rule requires at least 2 hectares, outside protected land and the indicated flood zone. Among eligible sites, choose the lowest stated walk time. It is an explicit exercise rule, not a real planning approval.

Scroll the diagram sideways to see the full resource.

Fictional site-selection overlaysNorth is up. Blue band: excluded flood zone. Green block: protected land. Sites: A: protected no, flood zone no, area 3 hectares, walk 11 minutes; B: protected no, flood zone yes, area 2 hectares, walk 19 minutes; C: protected yes, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 15 minutes; D: protected no, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 7 minutes. Minimum area 2 hectares.ABCDFlood zoneProtectedlandRule: outside both zones; area at least 2 hectares.Among eligible sites, choose the shortest stated walk.
SiteProtected landFlood zoneArea (hectares)Walk to bus stop (min)
ANoNo311
BNoYes219
CYesNo515
DNoNo57
Fictional site-selection overlays. Original fictional resource; not an official map or real dataset.
Resource description

North is up. Blue band: excluded flood zone. Green block: protected land. Sites: A: protected no, flood zone no, area 3 hectares, walk 11 minutes; B: protected no, flood zone yes, area 2 hectares, walk 19 minutes; C: protected yes, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 15 minutes; D: protected no, flood zone no, area 5 hectares, walk 7 minutes. Minimum area 2 hectares.

1. How many sites meet every eligibility condition?

2. Which site does the stated rule select?

Choose an answer

3. What does the exercise establish?

Choose an answer

The maps and data are fictional. These exercises do not count as required fieldwork.

Write an explanation

Check your answer
  • Separate physical occurrence from reliable access.
  • Explain technology through particular mechanisms.
  • Evaluate governance, demand and distribution.
  • Compare conditional futures and remaining risks.

Practise and review a written answer

Case studies

Singapore’s diversified water supply · The shrinking Aral Sea · Mining and development in Peru · Adapting tidal flood protection in the Thames Estuary

These pages provide selected evidence. Check the whole case requirement with your teacher.

Read further

Water security and competing uses · Power, energy and reliable supply · Global value chains

Course links

AQA A-level Geography · Pearson Edexcel A-level Geography · Eduqas A-level Geography

Next topics

Water cycles: budgets, residence time and feedback · Energy resources: demand, generation and decisions

Selected teaching sequence with fictional worked data. The linked case records supply bounded evidence; they do not satisfy every course case requirement.

Worked numerical examples are fictional unless explicitly attributed. These lessons cover selected parts of the topic; check your course requirements for the rest.