Managing hillside farming in Rwanda

Project watersheds in Rwanda

The Land Husbandry, Water Harvesting and Hillside Irrigation project addressed cultivation on slopes. Terracing and soil management aimed to retain soil and water; reservoirs and irrigation were used in selected places.

Evaluate farming changes at the scale of the surveyed project sites. A project objective is not a measured increase in every farmer’s yield, and a national food-security claim needs national evidence.

Saved on this browser. An example’s listed role does not certify that it covers every specification dimension.

Recall the evidence

Case-recall questions load here. The sourced evidence remains available below.

Evidence and its scope

ClaimPeriod and scopeSource
World Bank documentation describes terracing, soil improvement, runoff management and selected irrigation as approaches to reducing hillside erosion.

historical evidence

Project description published 2011

Rwandan project watersheds

Open source

Checked 2026-10-07

The World Bank catalogue identifies a third follow-up impact-evaluation survey conducted in Rwanda in 2014.

historical evidence

2014 survey

Land Husbandry, Water Harvesting and Hillside Irrigation impact-evaluation sample

Open source

Checked 2026-10-07

Possible requirement roles

Practise using the evidence

Responses are not automatically scored. Use the guidance to check the evidence and reasoning.

Apply a related skill

Sampling methods · Percentage change · Source evaluation

Compare with Viet Nam and global value chains

Compare local agricultural productivity with national production and trade. Do not apply project outcomes to the whole economy.

Viet Nam and global value chains

Check the comparison

Use a shared criterion, explain the geographical process and keep each source’s period and boundary. Different totals may reflect different definitions or populations. A comparison needs more than two separate descriptions.

Related lessons

Food security: supply, access and sustainable choices