Hurricane Katrina, 2005

US Gulf Coast · Event or project period: 2005

New Orleans in its regional settingCountry outlines and a red location marker at 29.95°N, 90.07°W. Regional locator only; the point is not a boundary or hazard footprint.United StatesMexicoGulf of MexicoN
New Orleans · 29.95°N, 90.07°W. Approximate location; country outlines are regional context, not a detailed site map. Natural Earth, 1:50 million, public domain.
Floodwater beside the 17th Street Canal breach in New Orleans after Katrina; FEMA caption dates the photograph 30 August 2005.
Floodwater beside the 17th Street Canal breach in New Orleans after Katrina; FEMA caption dates the photograph 30 August 2005. Jocelyn Augustino / FEMA · Public domain in the United States: US federal employee official duties (PD-USGov-FEMA). Resized and converted to WebP; no content changes.

Setting

Katrina crossed the northern Gulf coast on 29 August 2005. New Orleans depended on levees, floodwalls and pumps to manage flood risk.

Sources: mvn.usace.army.mil

Why flood defences failed

Storm surge strained the protection system. Some floodwalls failed before water reached their tops; other structures were overtopped. Floodwater eventually covered about 80% of New Orleans.

Sources: upload.wikimedia.org

Human and economic costs

The NHC's 2023 revision gives 1,392 fatalities across direct, indirect and indeterminate causes. Its US damage estimate is $125 billion in 2005 dollars. These figures cover Katrina's US impacts, not New Orleans alone.

Sources: upload.wikimedia.org

Emergency response

The Coast Guard and other responders rescued survivors from rooftops. Engineers repaired flood defences and pumped water out while planning a stronger regional system.

Sources: usace.army.mil

Reducing future risk

The replacement system combines levees, floodwalls, gates and pumps. FEMA accredited it in February 2014 for a 1% annual chance level of flood risk reduction. Evacuation planning remains necessary because greater events and failures remain possible.

Sources: usace.army.mil 1 · mvd.usace.army.mil 2

Using this case in an answer

Connect the storm with coastal exposure and flood-protection failures. Evaluate emergency response and later engineering separately, including the continuing need for evacuation.

  • Use the revised NHC fatality total with its report date. Older sources give different totals.
  • A 1% annual-chance standard reduces risk; it does not prevent every flood or replace evacuation.

Saved on this browser. An example’s listed role does not certify that it covers every specification dimension.

Evidence and its scope

ClaimPeriod and scopeSource
Katrina weakened from Category 5 to Category 3 before Louisiana landfall

historical evidence

28–29 August 2005

Louisiana landfall; not all landfalls

Open source

Checked 2026-10-18

Approximately 80% of New Orleans flooded

historical evidence

Within about a day of landfall, August 2005

New Orleans

Open source

Checked 2026-10-18

Revised fatality total: 520 direct, 565 indirect and 307 indeterminate

1,392 fatalities

historical evidence

NHC revision January 2023, concerning 2005 event

US Katrina fatalities across categories

Open source

Checked 2026-10-18

Damage estimate

125 billion USD (2005 prices)

historical evidence

2005 event; NHC updated report

United States

Open source

Checked 2026-10-18

FEMA accreditation announced for the replacement protection system

historical evidence

21 February 2014 announcement; accreditation previous day

Greater New Orleans HSDRRS

Open source

Checked 2026-10-18

Design addresses a surge level with 1% chance in any year

historical evidence

Post-Katrina system described in 2025 retrospective

HSDRRS design standard; not zero flood risk

Open source

Checked 2026-10-18

Possible requirement roles

Recall the evidence

Case-recall questions load here. The sourced evidence remains available below.

Ready? Test your recall →

Practise using the evidence

Responses are not automatically scored. Use the guidance to check the evidence and reasoning.

Apply a related skill

Source evaluation · Choropleth maps

Related lessons

Weather hazards and atmospheric circulation

Build a better answer

Use a fresh resource to practise selecting evidence and explaining its significance.