Energy demand, output and competing priorities

Distinguish annual output from capacity and assess costs, reliability and emissions.

Energy demand, output and competing priorities

Original fictional unfamiliar-resource pack. Work across the resources; each describes the same teaching scenario. This is not an official examination paper or a real project forecast.

Capacity, output and land

ProjectCapacity (MW)Capacity factor (%)Annual output (GWh)Capital cost (£ million)New land footprint (ha)
Wind203866.581824
Solar roofs151418.4120
Small hydro104135.92198
Original fictional teaching data. These are not observations or predictions for a real place.
Resource description

Annual output = capacity × capacity factor/100 × 8,760 hours ÷ 1,000. Capacity is a power rate; output is an energy quantity.

Demand and emissions

MeasureValueUnit
Annual local demand90GWh
Wind: lifecycle emissions intensity12g CO₂e/kWh
Solar roofs: lifecycle emissions intensity35g CO₂e/kWh
Small hydro: lifecycle emissions intensity24g CO₂e/kWh
Original fictional teaching data. These are not observations or predictions for a real place.
Resource description

Fictional lifecycle intensity estimates use the same boundary. They are not operational emissions only; output timing, storage and grid losses are omitted.

Management alternatives

OptionCapital cost (£ million)BenefitLimitation
Wind18Estimated annual output 66.58 GWh; Lifecycle intensity 12 g CO₂e/kWhVariable generation and landscape effects; Operating costs and grid connection need separate assessment
Solar roofs12Estimated annual output 18.4 GWh; Lifecycle intensity 35 g CO₂e/kWhSeasonal generation and roof agreements; Operating costs and grid connection need separate assessment
Small hydro19Estimated annual output 35.92 GWh; Lifecycle intensity 24 g CO₂e/kWhRiver ecology and low-flow constraints; Operating costs and grid connection need separate assessment
Original fictional teaching data. These are not observations or predictions for a real place.
Resource description

Available capital budget: £20 million. Options are alternatives; their benefits cannot simply be added. Operating costs are separate.

Options

Wind

Capital cost: £18 million

Estimated annual output 66.58 GWh

Lifecycle intensity 12 g CO₂e/kWh

Variable generation and landscape effects

Operating costs and grid connection need separate assessment

Solar roofs

Capital cost: £12 million

Estimated annual output 18.4 GWh

Lifecycle intensity 35 g CO₂e/kWh

Seasonal generation and roof agreements

Operating costs and grid connection need separate assessment

Small hydro

Capital cost: £19 million

Estimated annual output 35.92 GWh

Lifecycle intensity 24 g CO₂e/kWh

River ecology and low-flow constraints

Operating costs and grid connection need separate assessment

Stakeholder statements

Grid operator: We need output when demand occurs, not only a yearly total.

Resident: Local environmental effects and affordability need consideration.

Climate adviser: Compare lifecycle boundaries consistently.

1. Calculate the wind annual output in GWh to two decimal places.

2. What percentage of annual local demand could wind output equal, ignoring timing and losses?

3. Explain why annual output equal to a large share of demand does not guarantee a secure supply at all times.

4. Which comparison uses matching quantities?

Choose an answer

5. Recommend an option for energy demand, output and competing priorities. Use at least two resources, compare an alternative and address an uncertainty or stakeholder concern.

Limits of this resource model
  • Capacity factors are fictional assumptions.
  • Annual balances do not represent hourly security or whole-system cost.

Make an editable teacher pack