Development indicators and unequal change

Compare income, services and population denominators across two periods.

Development indicators and unequal change

Original fictional unfamiliar-resource pack. Work across the resources; each describes the same teaching scenario. This is not an official examination paper or a real project forecast.

Two-period indicators

PlaceIncome per person in constant units, period 1Income per person in constant units, period 2Population, period 1Population, period 2
Aster21002700450000490000
Bela32003500260000330000
Corda20002900220000280000
Original fictional teaching data. These are not observations or predictions for a real place.
Resource description

Constant units are fictional purchasing-power-adjusted units with the same base period. They are not exchange-rate dollars or real national statistics.

Access and distribution in period 2

PlaceHouseholds with reliable water (%)Income received by richest 20% of households (%)
Aster8141
Bela7143
Corda6050
Original fictional teaching data. These are not observations or predictions for a real place.
Resource description

An income share is different from the proportion of households described. These figures alone do not provide a complete inequality index.

Management alternatives

OptionCapital cost (£ million)BenefitLimitation
Improve reliable water supply6.5Can improve health and reduce time spent collecting waterRequires maintenance and equitable access
Vocational education and employment access4.8May widen income opportunitiesJobs and participation barriers also matter
Market access and storage7.5Can connect producers to buyers and reduce lossesBenefits may concentrate among larger businesses
Original fictional teaching data. These are not observations or predictions for a real place.
Resource description

Available capital budget: £8 million. Options are alternatives; their benefits cannot simply be added. Operating costs are separate.

Options

Improve reliable water supply

Capital cost: £6.5 million

Can improve health and reduce time spent collecting water

Requires maintenance and equitable access

Vocational education and employment access

Capital cost: £4.8 million

May widen income opportunities

Jobs and participation barriers also matter

Market access and storage

Capital cost: £7.5 million

Can connect producers to buyers and reduce losses

Benefits may concentrate among larger businesses

Stakeholder statements

Household representative: A national average does not describe our access to services.

Small producer: I need affordable access to markets, not only a larger regional output.

Public finance officer: Operating and maintenance costs continue after construction.

1. Calculate the percentage increase in income per person in Aster.

2. Calculate the increase in population in Aster, in people.

3. Explain why increased income per person does not establish that all households are better off.

4. Do these tables prove income growth caused improved water access?

Choose an answer

5. Recommend an option for development indicators and unequal change. Use at least two resources, compare an alternative and address an uncertainty or stakeholder concern.

Limits of this resource model
  • The places and indicators are fictional.
  • A rising average alone cannot establish broad-based improvement.

Make an editable teacher pack